Getting Paid to Buy Stocks You Already Want: Cash-Secured Puts on PayPal
Getting Paid to Buy Stocks You Already Want: Cash-Secured Puts on PayPal
The One-Sentence Version
A cash-secured put is a promise to buy a stock you already want at a price you already like, in exchange for an upfront premium. If the stock hits your price, you get the shares. If it does not, you keep the premium. Both outcomes have to be acceptable to you. That is the entire framework.
A Concrete PayPal Example
Assume PayPal trades at $45 and I already own shares. I am open to buying more, ideally at a discount. $45 is fine, but $43 would be better.
I sell one June 12 expiration $43 strike put. One contract represents 100 shares. Suppose the premium is $0.80 per share, so I collect $80 upfront. That $80 is mine no matter what happens next.
Two possible outcomes:
Scenario 1: PayPal closes below $43 at expiration I buy 100 shares at $43. Subtract the $80 premium and my effective cost basis is $42.20. I get my entry price, with a small discount on top.
Scenario 2: PayPal closes above $43 at expiration No shares change hands. I keep the $80. I tied up $4,300 in cash collateral for roughly a month and earned $80, which annualizes to about 22%.
Either outcome is acceptable. The strategy only works when both outcomes are something you actually want.
When to Use It and When Not To
I do not run cash-secured puts on every name. Three conditions have to hold.
- The underlying is already at or below fair value. The strike has to be a price where you genuinely want to own the stock.
- You are willing to add to the position. If you would not buy more shares at the strike, do not sell the put.
- You have cash you can lock up. The full strike times 100 shares is reserved until expiration or assignment.
PayPal meets all three for me. The valuation work behind that view is in PayPal's Triple Scenario.
The Mistakes People Make
A few traps catch people who are new to this.
The first is selling puts on stocks they don't actually want. A 22% annualized return looks attractive, so beginners write puts on names with shaky fundamentals. When they get assigned, they regret it. If you would not be happy owning the stock at the strike, do not sell the put.
The second is strikes set too far out of the money. A $35 strike on a $45 stock pays so little premium that the return on capital becomes trivial. A strike one step below current price usually gives the best balance of premium and assignment probability.
The third is treating it as a directional bet. Cash-secured puts are not a way to bet on the market going up or down. They are an entry-price negotiation tool. Stop trying to predict price and focus on where you want to own the stock.
What I Take Away
The reason I wish I had learned this 25 years ago is simple. Buying good companies at the prices you want requires patience. Patience becomes a lot easier when you are getting paid to wait.
PayPal is one of the names where I think this tool fits well right now. The stock is already cheap, so being assigned is a fine outcome. Not being assigned and keeping the premium is also a fine outcome. The strategy works only when you can honestly say that about both branches of the tree.
More in this Category
Coherent Wins — A Six-Round Scorecard for Five AI Infrastructure Stocks
Coherent Wins — A Six-Round Scorecard for Five AI Infrastructure Stocks
I scored Coherent (COHR), CoreWeave (CRWV), Nebius (NBIS), Iren (IREN), and Applied Digital (APLD) across six rounds. Coherent took it with 10 points, driven by the only debt-to-equity ratio under 32%.
Five Rules for Treating AI Infrastructure Stocks as Tactical, Not Core
Five Rules for Treating AI Infrastructure Stocks as Tactical, Not Core
Debt-to-equity across the five AI infrastructure plays spans 31% (Coherent) to 387% (CoreWeave). Here are five rules I use to treat them as tactical trades, not core holds.
Memory Sold Out Through 2027: Why Micron Now Prices Like a Utility
Memory Sold Out Through 2027: Why Micron Now Prices Like a Utility
Micron's HBM lines are effectively sold out through 2027, and that supply-demand gap is flowing directly into quarterly margins. Why waiting for a $480 pullback beats chasing the vertical line, and the three scenarios that would actually break the thesis.
Next Posts
The S&P 500 Is Up 9% — But 64 US Industries Are Quietly Collapsing
The S&P 500 Is Up 9% — But 64 US Industries Are Quietly Collapsing
In 2026, the S&P 500 is up 9% while 64 of 150 US industries are declining. Micron is up 523% from its lows; Nike is down 54% over the same window — and they're in the same index.
The Commodity Super Cycle's Four Cleanest Plays: NEM, CCJ, FCX, TTE
The Commodity Super Cycle's Four Cleanest Plays: NEM, CCJ, FCX, TTE
With CPI at 3.8%, real wages negative, and central banks buying 1,000 tons of gold a year, money is flowing into four commodity buckets. Here's my pick for each: Newmont, Cameco, Freeport-McMoRan, TotalEnergies.
Non-Residential Construction +330%, Comfort Systems +500% — The Infrastructure & Defense Boom's Hidden Winners
Non-Residential Construction +330%, Comfort Systems +500% — The Infrastructure & Defense Boom's Hidden Winners
While the S&P returned +9%, non-residential construction surged +330%, electronic components +300%, engineering +200%. AVGO, FIX, STX, CLS, RKLB, RTX, MTZ — the actual beneficiaries of the AI data-center buildout and NATO rearmament.
Previous Posts
When Fear Peaks, Fortunes Are Made: What 1929 Through 2020 Actually Taught Us
When Fear Peaks, Fortunes Are Made: What 1929 Through 2020 Actually Taught Us
Five historic crashes from the Great Depression to the 2020 pandemic show the same pattern — investors who bought at peak fear compounded at 11.5% to 20% annually for decades.
The Four Rules That Separate Real Crash Buyers From Pretenders
The Four Rules That Separate Real Crash Buyers From Pretenders
Buffett and Munger's framework for actually buying when markets collapse — a prepared watchlist, dry powder, emotional discipline, and accepting you won't catch the exact bottom.
Buffett Indicator at 137% — Today's Market Is More Expensive Than The Dot-Com Peak
Buffett Indicator at 137% — Today's Market Is More Expensive Than The Dot-Com Peak
Market cap to GDP sits at 137% overvalued versus 47% at the 2000 top, with CAPE at 42.05. Don't stop dollar cost averaging, but prepare for 8 to 15 years of choppy returns.