3 Space Stocks That Could Stumble After the SpaceX IPO: RKLB, ASTS, and RDW
3 Space Stocks That Could Stumble After the SpaceX IPO: RKLB, ASTS, and RDW
When You Can Buy the Real Thing, the Proxies Lose Their Premium
Rocket Lab has been a 10x revenue grower. AST SpaceMobile has FCC approval for 248 satellites and has proven phone-from-space connectivity works. Redwire has grown revenue 15x and supplies actual hardware to satellites and space stations. All three are real companies doing real work.
But all three share a problem. None of them make money. All are burning cash at an accelerating rate. And all carry a valuation premium that exists partly because investors couldn't buy SpaceX directly — until now.
When SpaceX goes public, that proxy premium is likely to compress. Here's what I'm watching for each name.
Rocket Lab: The Closest Public Proxy to SpaceX
Rocket Lab is the closest thing the public market has to SpaceX. They build and launch their own rockets with Electron, have a larger rocket called Neutron under development, and more than half of their revenue now comes from building satellites and space systems.
The growth numbers are staggering — revenue has increased more than 10x over approximately 6 years. But this is also where caution is warranted. Rocket Lab still doesn't make money. Losses are actually growing as the company pours cash into Neutron development. And management has opened the door to selling up to $3 billion of its own stock over time.
So you have the company itself becoming a major seller at exactly the moment SpaceX becomes available to buy. That's a setup for meaningful downside.
My entry zone: Low $90s — roughly a third of where it trades today. Given the direct competition with SpaceX, that kind of move is very much on the table.
AST SpaceMobile: The Boldest Bet with the Most SpaceX Exposure
AST SpaceMobile is trying to do something extraordinary — beam standard cellular signal from satellites directly to the phone in your pocket. No special hardware needed. They have FCC clearance for 248 satellites and working hardware in orbit proving the concept.
The problem is the financial reality. AST is barely generating any revenue while burning through hundreds of millions of dollars per year. At current prices, you're buying a vision, not a business.
What makes AST uniquely vulnerable to the SpaceX listing is its dual exposure. It competes directly with Starlink for the same direct-to-phone market, and it depends on SpaceX rockets to launch its own satellites. Competitor and supplier rolled into one — that's a difficult position when your competitor is about to become the most high-profile stock on the market.
My entry zone: Low $80s — closer to where fundamentals justify given the tight SpaceX dependency on both sides.
Redwire: Impressive Growth, Troubling Profit Trajectory
Redwire manufactures the infrastructure that goes on satellites and space stations — solar arrays, avionics, docking hardware — and recently added a defense drone business. Revenue growth has been remarkable at more than 15x over about 6 years.
But the profit picture is moving in the wrong direction. Losses have ballooned in recent years, and the company has funded much of its growth by issuing new shares. Dilution is a red flag that deserves attention.
My entry zone: Around $13-14. Whether it gets there depends on how crowded space names react when SpaceX becomes available.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Factor | Rocket Lab | AST SpaceMobile | Redwire |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (6 yrs) | 10x+ | Minimal | 15x+ |
| Profitability | Losses widening | Large losses | Losses ballooning |
| SpaceX relationship | Direct competitor | Competitor + dependent | Indirect supplier |
| Key risk | $3B stock shelf + SpaceX competition | Near-zero revenue + dual SpaceX exposure | Shareholder dilution |
| Entry zone | Low $90s (~1/3 of current) | Low $80s | $13-14 |
The Common Thread
None of these are bad businesses. They all address real markets with real technology. But they all operate in a crowded trade, they all burn cash aggressively, and they all carry some degree of "SpaceX proxy" premium.
When easy money rotates into SpaceX itself, these names are likely to pull back the hardest. That's not a reason to avoid them permanently — it's a reason to wait for better prices. The entry zones above are where I'd start getting interested, and the SpaceX listing may be exactly the catalyst that creates those opportunities.
More in this Category
SpaceX IPO: Why Insiders Won't Dump Their Shares
SpaceX IPO: Why Insiders Won't Dump Their Shares
Despite fears of a post-IPO crash like Uber or Rivian, three structural forces — tax friction, securities-backed lending, and a Nasdaq rule change — make a mass insider sell-off unlikely.
Five Ways to Play the SpaceX IPO — From Small Caps to Index Funds
Five Ways to Play the SpaceX IPO — From Small Caps to Index Funds
From small-cap space stocks up 160%+ to the AI chip supply chain and a simple QQQ index trade, here are five investment approaches ranked by risk for the SpaceX IPO wave.
Beta Technologies vs Rigetti Computing: Two Government-Backed Frontier Bets Compared
Beta Technologies vs Rigetti Computing: Two Government-Backed Frontier Bets Compared
Beta Technologies holds 7 of 8 FAA certification slots and a $3.9 billion aircraft backlog, while Rigetti Computing received a $100 million CHIPS Act letter of intent — both pre-revenue but backed by billions in US government funding.
Next Posts
Meta Q1 2026 Earnings Breakdown: 33% Revenue Growth and a Cash-Secured Put Strategy
Meta Q1 2026 Earnings Breakdown: 33% Revenue Growth and a Cash-Secured Put Strategy
Meta posted $56.3 billion in Q1 2026 revenue—up 33% year-over-year—with both ad impressions and pricing growing in double digits. Here's my valuation analysis and cash-secured put approach at $605 per share.
Uber Deep Dive: 3.6 Billion Trips Per Quarter, But Autonomous Driving Looms Large
Uber Deep Dive: 3.6 Billion Trips Per Quarter, But Autonomous Driving Looms Large
Uber completed 3.6 billion trips in Q1 2026 with $2.3 billion in free cash flow, but Waymo and Tesla FSD cast a long shadow. I break down the growth story against the autonomous driving threat.
Why I Buy SCHD Every Month: The Power of Dividend ETFs and Dollar Cost Averaging
Why I Buy SCHD Every Month: The Power of Dividend ETFs and Dollar Cost Averaging
With a 0.06% expense ratio and 3.3% dividend yield, SCHD offers a low-cost path to consistent income. Here's why monthly dollar cost averaging into this ETF works—and who it's not for.
Previous Posts
6 Quantum Computing Stocks for 2026: A Risk-by-Risk Breakdown
6 Quantum Computing Stocks for 2026: A Risk-by-Risk Breakdown
With the global quantum computing market projected to grow from $1.88 billion to nearly $20 billion by 2035 at a 30% CAGR, here's a detailed look at six quantum stocks—IonQ, IBM, Google, Honeywell, Rigetti, and D-Wave—analyzed by risk profile.
IonQ's Acquisition Blitz: 5 Strategic Bets to Build the Full Quantum Stack
IonQ's Acquisition Blitz: 5 Strategic Bets to Build the Full Quantum Stack
IonQ posted 755% year-over-year revenue growth while executing five strategic acquisitions—ID Quantique, LightCounting, Vector Atomic, Skyloom, and Skywater Technology—to build an end-to-end quantum platform. Here's why this ecosystem play could define the winner of the quantum race.
When Quantum Meets GPU: Why the Hybrid Model Is the Smartest Bet in Computing
When Quantum Meets GPU: Why the Hybrid Model Is the Smartest Bet in Computing
While most quantum companies aim to replace Nvidia, Rigetti is betting on a hybrid model where GPUs and QPUs work together. This paradigm shift from 'replacement' to 'coexistence' could reshape how investors approach the quantum computing space.