Three Undervalued Retail Stocks the Market Keeps Missing — Ulta, Sprouts, and Nike
Three Undervalued Retail Stocks the Market Keeps Missing — Ulta, Sprouts, and Nike
Retail is boring — that's the opportunity
Three of my seven picks run on bricks and shelves. They aren't glamorous. That's exactly why I think they're mispriced.
The shared grammar across all three: high returns on capital, new stores that still earn good returns, and a brand you can't copy overnight. I'm not betting on a revenue explosion. I just need each business to keep compounding naturally while the market eventually pays up. Let's take them one at a time.
1. Ulta Beauty — recession-resistant beauty leader at 16x free cash flow
Ulta is the largest beauty retailer in the United States. Bottom line first: you can buy a high-return, high-quality business at 16 times free cash flow.
It's a one-stop shop for makeup, skincare, hair, fragrance, and salon services, and more than 44 million loyalty members keep coming back. Beauty is also one of the most recession-resistant things people buy — even when money's tight, folks protect their self-care.
There's news this quarter, too. Ulta is winding down its store-inside-a-store deal with Target, but just teamed up with Bath & Body Works to put candles, scents, and body care in 600-plus Ulta stores starting in July.
Now the numbers. Market cap is roughly $20 billion, enterprise value $23.8 billion — that ~$4 billion gap is net debt. For a company with this many locations, carrying only $4 billion in debt while generating $1.22 billion in cash flow last year is very comfortable. It trades at 16x free cash flow, with a 40% gross margin and a remarkably steady net margin around 10% over the past decade. That's a combination I like.
Analysts see EPS growing from $26 this year to $59 in eight years — more than double, about 10% a year — with revenue climbing from $12.6 billion to $20 billion. I plugged in revenue growth of 3/5/7%, net margins of 9.5–11%, a 10-year-out P/E of 17/19/21, and a 9% required return. At today's $450, that gives a low of $450, a high of $816, and a mid of $610 — roughly a 13% annualized return on the middle case.
2. Sprouts Farmers Market — private label is lifting the margin
Sprouts is a specialty grocer for people who actually read ingredient labels. Here's the key: it already earns several times a normal grocer's margin, and its own private label is pushing that margin higher.
It runs 480-plus stores across 25 states and did about $2.3 billion in sales last quarter. A typical grocer like Kroger nets 1–2%; Sprouts nets 4.2% over ten years and 5.7% over the last one. Part of the secret is private label: overall gross margin is 39%, but its own brands run around 60%. The more of its own brand it sells, the higher the blended margin goes. I think this business can reach a 6–8% bottom-line margin — huge for a grocer.
The store economics are attractive too. A new store costs about $3 million and earns roughly 20% once it stabilizes, which is why management wants to nearly triple the store count.
Let me be honest about the risk. There's a securities-fraud class action targeting the CEO and CFO, and that was a big driver of the stock's fall. That's not something to wave off. Same-store sales also dipped slightly.
My assumptions: revenue growth of 4/6/8%, margins of 5/6/7%, a P/E of 16/19/22, and a 9% return. At today's $88 that produces a low of $80, a high of $187, and a mid of $125.
3. Nike — down 80%, but the brand moat is intact
Nike is down more than 80% from its 2021 peak — the biggest drop in company history. Even so, my question is simple: will Nike exist and be bigger 20 years from now?
KeyBank recently downgraded it, saying the turnaround is taking longer than hoped, with China and Europe still soft, and there's a new CFO coming over from Pfizer. The financials show why the market is scared. Free cash flow collapsed from a 5-year average of $4.35 billion to about $1 billion as the company cleared out bad inventory, and a ~$15 billion debt load with a dividend that eats $2.4 billion meant it had to dip into cash to fund the payout last year. Net margin slid from a 10-year average of 9.6% to 4.84% over the last year.
But there's a good tell: in the latest quarter, gross margin jumped from 40.8% to 49% once Nike stopped dumping inventory at steep discounts, and its wholesale numbers are improving year over year.
My honest opinion: Nike should cancel the dividend and buy back its cheap stock instead. I know that's unpopular, but if you believe the shares are cheap, it's the right move. My assumptions: revenue growth of 2.5/4.5/6.5%, margins and FCF margin of 9/9/10%, a P/E of 19/22/25 (reflecting high returns on capital), and a 9% return. At today's $42 that gives a low of $48, a high of $87, and a mid of $65 — about a 15% annualized return including the dividend.
The one line that ties all three together
Ulta, Sprouts, and Nike share one trait: they look like boring retail, but they're quality businesses that allocate capital well.
I didn't even assume much growth. When you plug in roughly half of analysts' revenue estimates and still get double-digit expected returns, that tells you the margin of safety is thick. Heads I win, tails I don't lose much — that's the setup I'm always after. Why I chose these over the Mag 7 is laid out in the personal Magnificent 7 story.
FAQ
Q: Isn't retail a dying business losing to Amazon and online?
A: Retail as a whole, maybe — but these three sit in areas that are hard to replace online. Beauty is a try-it, smell-it experience; fresh food runs on in-store trust; and Nike's moat is the brand itself. On top of that, Ulta and Sprouts are still opening profitable new stores, which tells you the physical demand is very much alive.
Q: Which of the three carries the most risk?
A: In the short term, Nike. Free cash flow has collapsed to about $1 billion and the dividend is eating into cash. That said, it's also fallen the most (80%), so if margins simply revert to historical levels, it has the most room to recover. Sprouts carries a separate risk in the securities-fraud suit against its CEO and CFO.
Q: Can you just tell me which one to buy right now?
A: That's not the point of this piece. Instead of handing you a pick, I'm showing you the process of setting assumptions and calculating value. The whole idea is for you to reach your own conclusion the same way.
More in this Category
Sales Exploding, Stock Stuck: The Complete Nvidia Bull vs Bear Case
Sales Exploding, Stock Stuck: The Complete Nvidia Bull vs Bear Case
Nvidia's revenue rocketed from $16B in 2021 to $253B in under five years, yet the stock has trailed AMD and Micron. Here's my read on Jensen Huang's 'parabolic demand' claim, the three bull cases, and the three bear cases.
Nvidia's Valuation: What's a Fair Price to Pay Right Now
Nvidia's Valuation: What's a Fair Price to Pay Right Now
A $5 trillion market cap, a 19.6x price-to-sales ratio, and a 63% one-year net margin. Running a conservative 10-year model (10-25% revenue growth, 35-55% margins), I get a mid fair value of $250 at a 9% required return, and $154 at my personal 15%.
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
If you're torn between selling Nvidia and holding it, a covered call can be the answer. Selling a Sept 18 $250 call pays about $3.37 per share (roughly 8.8% annualized); a $220 call pays $10.39 (about 27%). Here's how it works and where it bites.
Next Posts
Why Netflix Stock Fell While the Business Kept Winning
Why Netflix Stock Fell While the Business Kept Winning
Netflix fell back to its February lows even as it grew revenue 16% to $12.15B and pushed operating margin to ~32% — here’s why the stock dropped and why that gap between price and fundamentals matters.
Netflix Bull Case vs. Bear Case: Three Arguments on Each Side
Netflix Bull Case vs. Bear Case: Three Arguments on Each Side
Three honest bull cases — default global TV, a booming ad engine, and pricing power plus a $31.8B buyback — squared off against three bear cases: fading growth, sharper competition, and a price still built for perfection.
What Is Netflix Worth? A Ten-Year Model and My Buy Discipline
What Is Netflix Worth? A Ten-Year Model and My Buy Discipline
A ten-year Netflix model — 6–10% revenue growth, normalized 20–26% margins, a 20–26x exit multiple, discounted at 9% — lands intrinsic value near $74, but a 15% return hurdle means I only buy around $50.
Previous Posts
Micron's $41.5B Blowout: Revenue Up 346% and What Comes Next
Micron's $41.5B Blowout: Revenue Up 346% and What Comes Next
Micron just posted $41.5B in quarterly revenue, up 346% year over year — the best quarter in its 47-year history. Gross margin jumped from 39% to 85%, the market cap cleared $1.3 trillion, and roughly $100B in long-term contracts is now locked in.
Micron Bulls vs Bears: Is the Memory Boom-Bust Cycle Really Over?
Micron Bulls vs Bears: Is the Memory Boom-Bust Cycle Really Over?
I pit three bull cases against three bear cases on Micron — AI memory demand and $100B in signed contracts versus the industry's recurring glut cycle and the risk that AI won't need premium HBM forever.
What Is Micron Actually Worth? I Ran the Bull and Bear Numbers
What Is Micron Actually Worth? I Ran the Bull and Bear Numbers
I calculated Micron's fair value under two 10-year scenarios — a bull midpoint near $3,900 and a bear midpoint near $670. When the gap is that wide, here's why even Warren Buffett would pass.