Bitcoin Is Flat for Five Years While the Nasdaq Sits Near Highs — Why Recency Bias Is Dangerous
Bitcoin Is Flat for Five Years While the Nasdaq Sits Near Highs — Why Recency Bias Is Dangerous
On the illusion that "just buying the index is easy"
When the market goes up every day, people say: "Investing is easy — just buy index funds." Over very long stretches, that's broadly true. But in between, there are five-year windows where even an asset with a phenomenal track record gets absolutely crushed. Today I want to walk through why that recency bias is so dangerous.
Point 1 — Bitcoin: five years held, nominally flat, real loss
If you bought Bitcoin in 2021 and held to today, you're roughly flat in nominal terms. Ethereum is worse. That's over five years.
The real pain starts when you factor in inflation. Think about how much prices rose over this window — a little more than nothing, right? So on an inflation-adjusted basis, Bitcoin is much worse. You held passively for nearly six years and lost significant real money. To be fair, over its entire history Bitcoin has still massively outperformed the S&P 500 — but windows like this still exist.
I'm not trying to criticize crypto investors. Everyone makes mistakes; everyone makes bad calls. What I'm trying to show you is something else.
Point 2 — the same thing can happen to the Nasdaq, gold, and silver
The same thing can happen in the Nasdaq, in gold, in silver. Gold could sit in a range for ten years. The Nasdaq could be at the same level in five years that it is today. You can never say never in trading and investing — that's exactly what makes this hard.
Point 3 — Bitcoin vs the Nasdaq: why only one is dying
When inflation rises, risk assets are sensitive to it. That's why Bitcoin got pushed down to its lows for the year, around $60,000. So why is the Nasdaq not far off its highs?
The Nasdaq has a unique story right now — the same reason stocks have been so strong for three years: AI, data centers, and the excitement about replacing employees with AI agents. The market is still very much in that hype mode.
| Bitcoin | Nasdaq (semiconductor-led) | |
|---|---|---|
| Current position | Lows of the year (~$60K) | Not far off highs |
| Hype role | No longer the exciting asset | AI/semis absorb the hype |
| Inflation sensitivity | Very high (risk asset) | High, but offset by the AI narrative |
The semiconductor ETF SMH tracks names like Nvidia, AMD, and Micron, and these stocks are hot thanks to feverish AI demand. The "exciting meme/hype asset" role Bitcoin once played has moved over to semiconductors and space stocks.
Point 4 — so where I stand on the Nasdaq
I think the Nasdaq is due for a pullback. But I'm not short, and I'm not willing to short yet. Last week I said I'd be interested in shorting indices on a price breakdown, but I'm not there. Right now I'm very much neutral.
By EdgeFinder's scoring, the Nasdaq is at a +3 — a mixed read with no clear reason to go long or short. Still, some of the hype could deflate in these indices, and those resets can be painful. The Nasdaq can have very sharp corrections; we just haven't seen one in a couple of months, so people forget. For context, when the Fed got serious about fighting inflation in 2022-2023, the Nasdaq fell roughly 38% peak to trough — and the economy actually held up fine. What the Nasdaq hated was high rates themselves.
Wrap-up: a track record doesn't guarantee the future
Just because an asset has produced phenomenal alpha up to this point doesn't guarantee the next five years. Guard against recency bias and take positions for your own reasons. That's the single most important safeguard I set for myself watching markets every day.
This is for informational purposes only and is not financial advice.
More in this Category
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
If you're torn between selling Nvidia and holding it, a covered call can be the answer. Selling a Sept 18 $250 call pays about $3.37 per share (roughly 8.8% annualized); a $220 call pays $10.39 (about 27%). Here's how it works and where it bites.
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
In Q2 2026 the S&P 500 jumped ~15% and the Nasdaq ~21%, yet nearly 60% of tech stocks were in a bear market and the semiconductor index rose 82% in 100 trading days. Here's why the market split — and what it reveals about how narratives follow prices.
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Michael Burry is shorting Nvidia and Micron while buying hated value names; Buffett is sitting on nearly $400 billion in cash. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley both target S&P 8,000 by year-end. Here's both cases at full strength — and the 1999 quotes that should give bulls pause.
Next Posts
Friday's Plunge: A Dip to Buy or the Setup for a Black Monday?
Friday's Plunge: A Dip to Buy or the Setup for a Black Monday?
Across 199 historical cases where the S&P 500 fell 2% or more in a single day, average forward returns were actually positive. I weigh the stats and the put-call signal to ask whether this drop is a buy or the start of something worse.
Why Semiconductors Rip Highest and Crash Deepest
Why Semiconductors Rip Highest and Crash Deepest
The SMH ETF dropped nearly 9% in a single day, and back in 2001 it took semiconductors roughly 6,178 days to break even. I unpack the high-beta math behind the narrow AI rally, the trap of recency bias, and why small businesses may be the real AI winners.
Why I'm Short Silver — and the Poison You Pick With Trailing Stops
Why I'm Short Silver — and the Poison You Pick With Trailing Stops
With yields rising and oil jumping, I'm holding a silver short up roughly $13,000–$14,000. I lay out the macro case and the trailing-stop philosophy behind it: there is no perfect way to exit a winner, only a poison you choose.
Previous Posts
The De-escalation Trap: Why $90 Oil Makes Chasing Middle East Headlines So Risky
The De-escalation Trap: Why $90 Oil Makes Chasing Middle East Headlines So Risky
Markets rallied on hopes the Strait of Hormuz standoff and the Iran-Israel conflict are ending, but oil is still parked at $90 a barrel for a second month. The risk-reward of chasing the de-escalation trade looks poor.
Nasdaq at Fresh Highs — So Why I'm Preparing for a Correction
Nasdaq at Fresh Highs — So Why I'm Preparing for a Correction
The Nasdaq bottomed after just three days down and rocketed to new highs, leaving the uptrend pristine. But it's been a while since price retested the 50-, 100-, or 200-day moving averages, making a time correction or sideways range the most likely scenario.
Long Dollar, Short Gold, Short Bonds: Betting on Sticky Inflation This Week
Long Dollar, Short Gold, Short Bonds: Betting on Sticky Inflation This Week
The dollar index holds a +5 bullish score near the 99.4 resistance, while crowd sentiment on gold has flipped extremely bullish — a contrarian sell signal. Here's the long-dollar, short-gold, short-bonds thesis built on inflation staying sticky.