Why 7 of Bank of America's 10 Bear-Market Signposts Are Flashing Red
Why 7 of Bank of America's 10 Bear-Market Signposts Are Flashing Red
The headline number first: 7 of 10 lights are red
Bank of America just told its own clients, in effect, to stop buying stocks here. The first thing that jumped out at me reading the report was a single number: of the 10 "bear-market signposts" BofA has refined over many years, seven are now flashing red.
A bear market is nothing exotic — it's a big, lasting drop of 20% or more from the highs. A signpost is a warning light that history says tends to appear before such a drop. Think of your car's dashboard. One warning light coming on is no big deal; you can probably keep driving. But when light after light starts to glow, it's time to pull over and check.
What scares me more is the speed
The number 7 matters less than how fast they lit up. Five turned red by April, then two more flipped in May. Not slowly, one at a time — they came on in quick succession.
In plain language, these signals track things like:
- How confident ordinary people feel about the economy
- How much investors expect stocks to keep rising — because when everyone is sure stocks only go up, that's usually exactly when they don't
- Stress in the credit system — are people and companies struggling to borrow and repay, are banks getting nervous about lending
- Whether banks are quietly increasing their reserves for loan losses
If you're a value investor, watch this one light
The signal I care about most is a different one. BofA found that the most expensive stocks — the ones priced highest relative to what they actually earn — have been beating cheaper stocks by a massive margin. In their words, a sign of "excessive speculation."
Speculation is just gambling: buying because the price is rising and hoping it keeps rising. When the most expensive, most hyped names fly the highest, it means people have stopped asking what a business is actually worth. They're just chasing. Historically, that has not ended well.
Expensive on 17 of 20 yardsticks
BofA measured how pricey the market is using 20 different yardsticks. The result: the market is expensive on 17 of 20, and on 8 of them stocks are even pricier than during the 2000 dot-com bubble.
If you were around for that one, you know how it ended: 12 flat years for the S&P 500, 16 flat years for the Nasdaq — and inside that, an 80% drop in three years.
The gap inside tech is unsettling too. Between the best and worst names — Apple, Nvidia, Broadcom at the top — the spread is the widest since February 2000. The dot-com peak was March 2000, so this is the widest margin in over 26 years. When some stocks rocket while others sink that hard at the same time, BofA calls it a sign of rising instability.
For balance: three lights are still green
To be fair, three of the 10 are still green, and BofA was honest that today's big tech is far healthier than the dot-coms of 2000 — real businesses making real money, not profitless websites.
But here's the part I really want you to hear: even on the lights that are still green, the numbers are getting worse. The cash flow these tech giants generate has flatlined or fallen. They're spending nearly every dollar they make building out AI — by year-end the biggest names are expected to spend over 100% of their cash flow on it — and they're buying back fewer of their own shares. Those green lights aren't bright green. They're turning yellow, inching toward red.
Where BofA lands — and where I agree
BofA cut its S&P 500 target to 7,100, below where the market is currently trading. In other words, the index as a whole may have less room to run.
But they did not say sell everything and run. Their exact message: they see opportunity in individual S&P 500 stocks, just not in the overall index as one big basket. The average company may struggle; a good individual business at the right price can still do very well.
The article's headline urged readers to "take profits." I'm skeptical of hopping in and out of individual stocks based on market timing. If you bought a great company at a good price — or you're dollar-cost-averaging low-cost ETFs — riding it out usually beats trading the headlines. Read this alongside the 40% recession warning and the picture sharpens.
FAQ
Q: If 7 signposts are red, does a crash happen right now? A: No. These are warnings that the environment is getting risky, not timing tools. Nobody knows when — or in what form (a crash, or years of going sideways) — a big drop arrives.
Q: So should I sell all my stocks? A: Even BofA didn't say that. The point is to be cautious on the index as a whole while staying open to good individual businesses at fair prices.
More in this Category
Why the Dollar Is Strengthening Again: My Full Forex Book
Why the Dollar Is Strengthening Again: My Full Forex Book
The dollar index is defending 99.75 and eyeing 100.5, then 102. I break down my actual positions — a UUP long sitting around $4,000 in gains, short pound, short euro, and a yen long setup — alongside their fundamental scores.
CPI at 4.2%, Third Straight Rise — So Why Did Markets Exhale?
CPI at 4.2%, Third Straight Rise — So Why Did Markets Exhale?
US year-over-year inflation rose for a third consecutive month to 4.2%. A year ago it had fallen as low as 2.3%, near the Fed's target. Yet stocks popped slightly. The subtle but crucial detail: it came in line with expectations.
What Snapchat Taught Me About the SpaceX IPO
What Snapchat Taught Me About the SpaceX IPO
Across the last 15 years, 30 major IPOs posted an average one-year drawdown of roughly 55%. CoreWeave, up 300% in three months, is on that same list. Ahead of the SpaceX IPO, here's what tends to wait behind a glamorous debut — told through Snapchat.
Next Posts
The New Fed Chair's First FOMC: Three Clues From the Confirmation Hearing
The New Fed Chair's First FOMC: Three Clues From the Confirmation Hearing
Ahead of Kevin Warsh's first FOMC meeting, three statements from his Senate confirmation hearing tell us where he wants to take rates. I unpack 'I won't take orders from the White House,' 'AI drives prices down,' and 'no more forward guidance.'
The 1946 Playbook: How Governments Quietly Take Your Wealth
The 1946 Playbook: How Governments Quietly Take Your Wealth
Financial repression — holding interest rates below inflation — isn't a conspiracy theory; it's a policy economists study and the IMF publishes on. I walk through how the U.S. used it for 28 years to cut debt from 106% of GDP to 23%, and who actually paid the bill.
If You Own Silver, Watch These Three Indicators: Dollar, COMEX, Physical Supply
If You Own Silver, Watch These Three Indicators: Dollar, COMEX, Physical Supply
Here are the three silver indicators I track every week: the dollar index (lower is bullish for silver), COMEX inventory (down 3.6 million ounces this week), and a supply deficit now in its sixth year. I also explain why you shouldn't bet on a COMEX 'blow-up.'
Previous Posts
The AI Memory Gold Rush: The Real Money Is in the Picks and Shovels — A 5-Layer Supply Map
The AI Memory Gold Rush: The Real Money Is in the Picks and Shovels — A 5-Layer Supply Map
In the HBM memory boom, the steadiest money isn't in the makers but in the suppliers underneath — the tools, inspectors, testers, bonders, and materials. Here are 10 names across a 5-layer stack that get paid whether SK Hynix, Samsung, or Micron wins.
Why HBM Is Eating the World — Micron's $1 Trillion and the Memory Supercycle
Why HBM Is Eating the World — Micron's $1 Trillion and the Memory Supercycle
AI is consuming memory faster than the world can make it: HBM prices roughly doubled in a single quarter, makers are sold out into next year, and Micron just crossed $1 trillion. Here's why this supercycle is structurally different from past memory cycles.
Memory ETFs: DRAM vs HBMX — Not Which to Buy, but What Each One Holds
Memory ETFs: DRAM vs HBMX — Not Which to Buy, but What Each One Holds
Roundhill's DRAM ETF holds only the makers — Micron, SK Hynix, Samsung — while the new HBMX reaches down into equipment, packaging, and materials too. The point isn't which is better; it's that the two cover completely different parts of the same machine.