Why I'm Long Copper but Won't Touch Gold Right Now
Why I'm Long Copper but Won't Touch Gold Right Now
Two Commodities, Opposite Calls
Two commodities. I went long one yesterday and won't put a dollar in the other. The difference is one line on the macro scorecard.
Why Copper Pulled Me In
Copper had a very shallow pullback yesterday and I went long there. Price had broken above a key resistance, took a breather, and I stepped in during that pause. Stop sits below the prior resistance.
On the scorecard side, copper has been printing a strong macro reading for several days. It's not just the chart looking clean — inflation, jobs, and growth metrics are all pointing the same way, and that aligned with the chart at the same time. That's the spot I want.
My rule is simple: I only take a bet when macro momentum (economic data flow) and technical momentum (price flow) point the same direction simultaneously. Copper meets that bar right now.
So Why Not Gold
Plenty of viewers ask me to talk gold more. Sorry — pulling up the gold chart, the score is too neutral.
| Metric | Copper | Gold |
|---|---|---|
| Macro score | Strong buy | Neutral |
| Inflation | Favorable | Favorable |
| Jobs | Favorable | Negative (dollar tailwind) |
| Growth | Favorable | Negative (dollar tailwind) |
| Chart | Key resistance broken | Range |
Gold does have one favorable input — softer-than-expected inflation. That's a positive. But strong jobs data and resilient growth point to a strong dollar, and a strong dollar is gold-negative. The two forces are roughly canceling out, which is what gold looks like right now.
When an asset is in that state, I leave it alone. Betting on a setup you can't read clearly tends to teach you the lesson via losses.
That Doesn't Mean I've Quit Gold
Long-term, I'm a gold bull. So when short-term momentum isn't there, I use a different instrument.
Yesterday I sold a May 29 $83 cash-secured put on GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF). Here's what that means:
- I sold someone a $83 put and collected the premium.
- If GDX falls below $83, I have to buy shares at $83.
- If GDX trades sideways, slightly down, or up, I just keep the premium.
$83 is right around the 200-day moving average — i.e., "the level I'd actually want to be a buyer at." Selling the put there means getting paid to wait at that level.
This is fundamentally different from going outright long with a tight stop. It's a way to express a long-term bullish view through option-selling when the short-term trade signal isn't clean.
Same Logic on XOP
Crude itself is trying to hold $88/bbl support. It hasn't fallen back to $65 even after the wartime move unwound, which tells me geopolitical risk hasn't fully cleared.
I used the same option play here. I sold a $148 cash-secured put on XOP (oil & gas E&P ETF). Since I sold it, the share price has risen and time has decayed the put — currently up $665 unrealized.
Wrapping Up
- Short-term active trading: only when macro and technical momentum are both strong simultaneously. Copper passes, gold doesn't.
- I don't force trades on assets without momentum. Trading a quiet chart just burns time.
- Long-term bullish views can be expressed through option selling. The GDX put and the XOP put are both examples.
Trading is risky. This is my view, not advice.
More in this Category
$350 Billion Is About to Leave the Market: The Triple IPO Collision and Big Tech's Dilution Wave
$350 Billion Is About to Leave the Market: The Triple IPO Collision and Big Tech's Dilution Wave
SpaceX ($75B), OpenAI ($60B), and Anthropic ($60B) are racing to IPO at the same time while Google prints $85B in new shares — draining roughly $350 billion of liquidity over the coming months. The key question is where that cash actually comes from.
Is Holding the S&P 500 Really Diversified? Why 10 Stocks Made 72% of This Year's Gains
Is Holding the S&P 500 Really Diversified? Why 10 Stocks Made 72% of This Year's Gains
The S&P 500 looks like 500 diversified stocks, but 72% of this year's gains came from the top 10 names, and those 10 make up about 40% of the index. Owning the index may actually be a concentrated bet on a handful of stocks.
Why Your Index Fund Will Sell Your Winners Without Asking: Rebalancing and the Three Forces
Why Your Index Fund Will Sell Your Winners Without Asking: Rebalancing and the Three Forces
Under Nasdaq's 'fast entry' rule, a giant like SpaceX can join the Nasdaq-100 just 15 trading days after listing, forcing every tracking fund to sell existing holdings to buy it. Your winning stocks get sold without your consent.
Next Posts
Why I'm Long Copper After the Breakout
Why I'm Long Copper After the Breakout
I went long copper (CPER) after a clean breakout above prior highs. EdgeFinder gives copper a +6 reading, institutional COT positioning has been building, and strong US jobs and retail sales make the global-growth proxy compelling versus gold.
Has Gold's Bull Case Quietly Disappeared?
Has Gold's Bull Case Quietly Disappeared?
Gold's multi-year bull case rested on rate cuts and money printing. With central banks now pausing or hiking, and US jobs and growth still resilient, the macro story has flipped to neutral — and I'm waiting for a clean break above resistance before re-engaging.
AAII Bulls Hit 46% — Is That a Sell Signal?
AAII Bulls Hit 46% — Is That a Sell Signal?
AAII bullish sentiment just flipped back to 46%. A 284-occurrence backtest of 'bulls > 45%' shows negative 1-day, 1-week, and 1-month average returns, with the 12-month average at 7.6% — below the long-run 10% baseline.
Previous Posts
Is Meta Still a Buy After Bouncing Back From the 2026 Pullback?
Is Meta Still a Buy After Bouncing Back From the 2026 Pullback?
Meta now trades at $671 with a $1.72T market cap. Running a 10-year DCF with 6/9/12% revenue growth and a terminal P/E of 23 puts mid-case intrinsic value near $870 — a 12.3% potential annualized return.
Alphabet's Four Engines and Why $316 Is Just the Starting Point
Alphabet's Four Engines and Why $316 Is Just the Starting Point
Google search, YouTube, Cloud, and Waymo make Alphabet a four-engine compounder. With 7/9/13% revenue growth and a terminal P/E of 23, my mid-case fair value is $316 against today's $335 — but I keep my own watchlist closer to $225.
Is Amazon's Capex Bet Worth Stomaching the Free Cash Flow Drought?
Is Amazon's Capex Bet Worth Stomaching the Free Cash Flow Drought?
Amazon's free cash flow is $7.7B versus $77.7B net income — a 10x gap entirely driven by AI capex. At today's $247, my base-case fair value sits at $230 with a 12% margin assumption Amazon has never hit. My watchlist stays at $200.