FANG Did 25.8% a Year, the Mag Seven 35.4% — So Why Do Most People Lose Money?
FANG Did 25.8% a Year, the Mag Seven 35.4% — So Why Do Most People Lose Money?
TL;DR FANG returned about 955% equal-weighted (25.8% annualized) over 10 years (2013–2023); the Mag Seven returned 35.4% annualized over 3 years (2023–2026). But the label almost always gets attached after the big gains are done. It's the price, not the nickname, that decides your return.
The real reason these lists get famous
The returns. Making one of these lists usually means a stock has already had huge gains — which is exactly why a fresh list grabs everyone's attention the moment it appears.
Let's look at the actual numbers, not the vibes.
FANG's decade: even the worst was 19% a year
From February 2013 to May 2023 — about ten years (all split-adjusted).
Netflix returned a total of 1,369%, roughly 30% annualized. Apple, Meta, Amazon, and Alphabet (Google) all posted double-digit annual returns too, and even the weakest of the bunch did 19% a year over a decade. That figure still amazes me — the "worst" one compounded at 19% annually.
Held in equal weight (the same dollar amount in each), that FANG basket returned about 955%, or 25.8% annualized — well ahead of the index.
The Mag Seven's three years: 35% a year
From May 2023 to June 2026 — the record so far.
Nvidia, Google, Meta, Amazon, Tesla, Apple, Microsoft. The weakest was, surprisingly, Microsoft at 5.6% annualized; the best was Nvidia at 75.6%. The equal-weight Mag Seven basket did 35.4% annualized. Keep in mind, though, that this is a three-year record versus FANG's ten.
The trap: the returns come before the name
Here's the point I weigh most heavily.
By the time the hype has matured and the label gets attached, much of the return has already happened. Think of Cathie Wood's ARK Investment. Measured from the fund's start, Wood may be up — but the vast majority of actual investors lost money. Why? Because they got in after the hype had already played out.
Hype only becomes hype after the big gains are realized. The moment a label appears isn't when the party is peaking — it's usually when the party is winding down. The return you see the day a stock joins the list is the return that's already gone, not the one ahead of you.
So what actually matters
A cool nickname tells you nothing about whether a company is a great business or whether today's price is reasonable.
This is why I keep repeating it. We're forever rotating into whatever is hottest most recently. Death, taxes, and cycles — I call the cycle life's third certainty. The lists change, but the principle doesn't: pick a great business and buy it at a reasonable price. The nickname is just decoration.
More in this Category
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
If you're torn between selling Nvidia and holding it, a covered call can be the answer. Selling a Sept 18 $250 call pays about $3.37 per share (roughly 8.8% annualized); a $220 call pays $10.39 (about 27%). Here's how it works and where it bites.
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
In Q2 2026 the S&P 500 jumped ~15% and the Nasdaq ~21%, yet nearly 60% of tech stocks were in a bear market and the semiconductor index rose 82% in 100 trading days. Here's why the market split — and what it reveals about how narratives follow prices.
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Michael Burry is shorting Nvidia and Micron while buying hated value names; Buffett is sitting on nearly $400 billion in cash. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley both target S&P 8,000 by year-end. Here's both cases at full strength — and the 1999 quotes that should give bulls pause.
Next Posts
Michael Burry's 'Whale Fall' Strategy: Warning of an AI Bubble While Buying the Ignored Stocks
Michael Burry's 'Whale Fall' Strategy: Warning of an AI Bubble While Buying the Ignored Stocks
Burry is warning the AI trade is turning into a dot-com-style bubble while quietly buying nine beaten-down, non-AI names. His logic is a 'whale fall' — while everyone watches AI, perfectly healthy businesses have sunk to the bottom and are being left for dead.
Every Stock Burry Bought, Broken Down: PayPal, Adobe, Alibaba — and the Samsung Mystery
Every Stock Burry Bought, Broken Down: PayPal, Adobe, Alibaba — and the Samsung Mystery
PayPal (-24%), Adobe (-42%), Lululemon (-40%), Veeva (-30%) — what Burry's buys share isn't losses, it's neglect. Here's the reasoning and the standout quote behind each name, plus the unnamed mystery stock.
Price vs. Value: Running Burry's Stocks Through My Own Valuation Process
Price vs. Value: Running Burry's Stocks Through My Own Valuation Process
PayPal trades at 7x free cash flow, Adobe at 7.5x — against roughly 45x for the Nasdaq 100, that's extreme mispricing. Using free cash flow, buybacks, and DCF returns, I put five names on the same yardstick to answer one question: what price is worth paying?
Previous Posts
Berkshire's Record $397 Billion in Cash Is the Loudest Warning I See
Berkshire's Record $397 Billion in Cash Is the Loudest Warning I See
Berkshire Hathaway is sitting on a record $397.4 billion in cash and has been a net seller of stocks for 14 straight quarters. Here's why I read that silence as the market's loudest warning.
What the Buffett Indicator Says: This Is One of the Priciest Markets in 100 Years
What the Buffett Indicator Says: This Is One of the Priciest Markets in 100 Years
The Buffett Indicator — total market cap to GDP — is now pointing to roughly 140–142% overvaluation. Using historical data against 1929 and 2000, here's why the next decade's returns worry me.
Why Does the Market Keep Hitting Highs While the Bad News Piles Up?
Why Does the Market Keep Hitting Highs While the Bad News Piles Up?
With inflation at 4.2%, credit-market stress, and crypto crashes, the S&P keeps setting records. Here's the truth behind a 'rally' where 8 of 11 sectors fell — and the discipline individual investors should adopt.