FANG Did 25.8% a Year, the Mag Seven 35.4% — So Why Do Most People Lose Money?

FANG Did 25.8% a Year, the Mag Seven 35.4% — So Why Do Most People Lose Money?

FANG Did 25.8% a Year, the Mag Seven 35.4% — So Why Do Most People Lose Money?

·2 min read
Share

TL;DR FANG returned about 955% equal-weighted (25.8% annualized) over 10 years (2013–2023); the Mag Seven returned 35.4% annualized over 3 years (2023–2026). But the label almost always gets attached after the big gains are done. It's the price, not the nickname, that decides your return.

The real reason these lists get famous

The returns. Making one of these lists usually means a stock has already had huge gains — which is exactly why a fresh list grabs everyone's attention the moment it appears.

Let's look at the actual numbers, not the vibes.

FANG's decade: even the worst was 19% a year

From February 2013 to May 2023 — about ten years (all split-adjusted).

Netflix returned a total of 1,369%, roughly 30% annualized. Apple, Meta, Amazon, and Alphabet (Google) all posted double-digit annual returns too, and even the weakest of the bunch did 19% a year over a decade. That figure still amazes me — the "worst" one compounded at 19% annually.

Held in equal weight (the same dollar amount in each), that FANG basket returned about 955%, or 25.8% annualized — well ahead of the index.

The Mag Seven's three years: 35% a year

From May 2023 to June 2026 — the record so far.

Nvidia, Google, Meta, Amazon, Tesla, Apple, Microsoft. The weakest was, surprisingly, Microsoft at 5.6% annualized; the best was Nvidia at 75.6%. The equal-weight Mag Seven basket did 35.4% annualized. Keep in mind, though, that this is a three-year record versus FANG's ten.

The trap: the returns come before the name

Here's the point I weigh most heavily.

By the time the hype has matured and the label gets attached, much of the return has already happened. Think of Cathie Wood's ARK Investment. Measured from the fund's start, Wood may be up — but the vast majority of actual investors lost money. Why? Because they got in after the hype had already played out.

Hype only becomes hype after the big gains are realized. The moment a label appears isn't when the party is peaking — it's usually when the party is winding down. The return you see the day a stock joins the list is the return that's already gone, not the one ahead of you.

So what actually matters

A cool nickname tells you nothing about whether a company is a great business or whether today's price is reasonable.

This is why I keep repeating it. We're forever rotating into whatever is hottest most recently. Death, taxes, and cycles — I call the cycle life's third certainty. The lists change, but the principle doesn't: pick a great business and buy it at a reasonable price. The nickname is just decoration.

Share

Ecconomi

Finance & Economics major at a U.S. university. Securities report analyst.

Learn more
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Investment decisions should be made at your own discretion and risk.

More in this Category

Previous Posts

Ecconomi

A professional financial content platform providing in-depth analysis and investment insights on global financial markets.

Navigation

The content on this site is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or financial guidance. Investment decisions should be made based on your own judgment and responsibility.

© 2026 Ecconomi. All rights reserved.