Why I Trimmed Nvidia at the Highs — And Kept the Core Position
Why I Trimmed Nvidia at the Highs — And Kept the Core Position
TL;DR: Nvidia is heading into an earnings event with a roughly $78-78.5B revenue guide and ~77% YoY growth, sitting on $34.2B in unrestricted cash against just $8.5B in long-term debt. I trimmed near the highs not because the story changed, but because concentration risk management is rule number one — and the cash I extracted is now waiting for the next pullback.
What I Actually Did
Last week, as the market pushed up toward historic peaks, I executed a series of disciplined, selective trims on one of my biggest winners. This was not a thesis change. It was rule number one of surviving this game: manage your concentration, protect your financial base, and keep dry powder for the next setup.
Notice the word "selective." I still hold a large core position, and Nvidia remains one of the strongest long-term opportunities I see in the entire market. If I were starting from nothing today, I would be aggressively buying — not selling.
The Numbers Driving the Thesis
Here is what the next earnings event looks like at a glance.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Quarterly revenue guide | $78.0B – $78.5B |
| YoY revenue growth | ~77% |
| Unrestricted cash | $34.2B |
| Long-term debt | $8.5B |
The key thing to internalize is that 77% growth is being printed on top of an already enormous base. That is not normal late-cycle behavior. And the balance sheet behind it — a roughly 4-to-1 cash-to-debt ratio — is what gives me permission to keep a large core position through any near-term volatility.
Why Trim At All, Then?
The most expensive lesson in this market is selling a name into a panic because you can't defend the position in one clean sentence. If you bought a stock because the chart looked great, the first 10% pullback will eject you.
The inverse is also true. When the market is celebrating, that is when serious investors lighten size — not conviction. You trim a slice, lock in capital, and stand ready to redeploy when fear returns. This is not prediction. It is procedure.
The current macro tape — oil near $109, renewed inflation worries, a broad sell-off across semiconductors and memory — looks ugly. But it is also exactly the kind of tape that quietly produces the entries I have been waiting for.
The One-Sentence Defense of the Core
If I had to compress the long-term Nvidia thesis into a single sentence, it would be this: the multi-year acceleration in hyperscaler capex is being funneled through a single near-monopoly on accelerated compute, sitting on a near-debt-free fortress balance sheet.
As long as that sentence is still true, the core does not move. Only the sizing does.
What This Means For You
- Near all-time highs, write down — in one sentence — why you still own each large position. If you cannot, that is a candidate for a full exit, not just a trim.
- Core positions are defended by cash-flow structure, not by macro headlines. The thicker the cash cushion vs debt, the more right you have to ignore panic.
- A broad sell-off is when you go back to the pre-set ladder of entries you wrote down in calm conditions. Pre-commit to the price; do not negotiate with the candle.
More in this Category
Coherent Wins — A Six-Round Scorecard for Five AI Infrastructure Stocks
Coherent Wins — A Six-Round Scorecard for Five AI Infrastructure Stocks
I scored Coherent (COHR), CoreWeave (CRWV), Nebius (NBIS), Iren (IREN), and Applied Digital (APLD) across six rounds. Coherent took it with 10 points, driven by the only debt-to-equity ratio under 32%.
Five Rules for Treating AI Infrastructure Stocks as Tactical, Not Core
Five Rules for Treating AI Infrastructure Stocks as Tactical, Not Core
Debt-to-equity across the five AI infrastructure plays spans 31% (Coherent) to 387% (CoreWeave). Here are five rules I use to treat them as tactical trades, not core holds.
Memory Sold Out Through 2027: Why Micron Now Prices Like a Utility
Memory Sold Out Through 2027: Why Micron Now Prices Like a Utility
Micron's HBM lines are effectively sold out through 2027, and that supply-demand gap is flowing directly into quarterly margins. Why waiting for a $480 pullback beats chasing the vertical line, and the three scenarios that would actually break the thesis.
Previous Posts
Palantir Isn't a SaaS Company — It's Infrastructure
Palantir Isn't a SaaS Company — It's Infrastructure
Classify Palantir as SaaS and the valuation looks insane next to a 19% YTD drop. But +85% revenue, a 145% Rule of 40, and 150% net retention say this isn't software — it's industrial-grade infrastructure.
Palantir Just Printed Record Numbers — Why Did the Market Yawn?
Palantir Just Printed Record Numbers — Why Did the Market Yawn?
Palantir posted $1.63B in quarterly revenue (+85% YoY), 60% operating margin, 53% net margin, US business +104%, and a 145% Rule of 40 — all in one quarter. The stock is still down ~19% on the year.
Palantir Is Down 19% This Year — Should You Have Sold?
Palantir Is Down 19% This Year — Should You Have Sold?
Palantir is down ~19% YTD even as it printed its best quarter ever. Here's how I think through whether to hold, sell, or add — and why the real problem is usually anchor, not analysis.