QQQ and SPY Reclaim All-Time Highs — 90 EMA Playbook and the Next Buy Zone
QQQ and SPY Reclaim All-Time Highs — 90 EMA Playbook and the Next Buy Zone
TL;DR QQQ ripped straight up after clearing 628–629 yesterday, and today retested the prior all-time high with a clean bounce. SPY needs to hold above 697. The next buy setup is a 697–698 retest with buyers stepping in. The 90 EMA on the 5-minute and 15-minute remains the most reliable intraday tool right now.
The moment QQQ cleared 628 and 629, the chart went nearly vertical.
That happened in a single session yesterday. Today it pushed one step further, retested the prior all-time high, and got a picture-perfect bounce off that level. The move was about as textbook as it gets.
What Actually Happened
Last week's tape was a cemetery for traders leaning aggressively short. I was one of them. Profits were made, but at this exact point, positions need to be reevaluated.
SPY cleared major resistance at 689–690 and pushed back toward all-time highs. QQQ broke 628–629 and got an immediate wave of tech-heavy buying, then delivered a clean bounce on the prior-high retest today. That's the critical observation right now.
The core pattern is simple. Strong sector (semiconductors) drags the index, the index reclaims its prior high, pullbacks stay shallow. As long as that combo holds, the direction is up.
90 EMA — The Most Reliable Short-Term Tool Right Now
I repeat this constantly, but the 90 EMA on the 5-minute and 15-minute has been working almost flawlessly in recent sessions.
This isn't hyperbole. For the past several days, both QQQ and SPY have seen intraday pullbacks stop and reverse precisely at the 90 EMA. The rule writes itself: hold above it, longs stay valid; lose it, flatten immediately.
Why this indicator? The 90 EMA isn't overly twitchy like the 20 or 50, and isn't too slow like the 200. It sits in a useful middle ground — medium-term context with short-term responsiveness. In a trending market, it gives you a mechanical answer to "where do I buy the dip?"
Next Setups on SPY and QQQ
The single most important level I'm watching is a SPY retest of 697–698.
| Index | Current | Key Support | First Resistance | Plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPY | ~700 | 697 | Yesterday's high | Long on 697–698 retest with buyer confirmation |
| QQQ | Near ATH | 628–629 | Prior ATH | Long if prior-high retest holds |
| SMH | Above 428 | 428 | ATH | Sector rally continues as long as 428 holds |
As long as SPY stays above 697, the bullish bias remains intact. Above 700, even better. If we get one more retest in this zone with buyers stepping in, that's the cleanest re-entry setup available.
Break 697, and the 90 EMA comes into play as the next reference. At that point, trim exposure and wait for the next support zone.
Peripheral Risk Check — Oil and Netflix
Oil got rejected at 95 (the 2023 high) and is pulling back. Below 95, I see downside toward 80–81, then the 200 and 100 SMAs. That said, the Strait of Hormuz blockade is still ongoing, and that variable alone can reignite crude at any moment. Fertilizers and corn are also attempting upward spikes — worth monitoring.
Netflix dropped about $10 after hours. At current levels, the open sits near $9,900. If that zone holds and buyers show up, the chart looks solid. Lose $9,900 and there's room down to the 100-day moving average.
What to Do, What to Avoid
This isn't the zone for aggressive new buying. Chasing near all-time highs has a poor risk-reward profile.
What to watch instead is a SPY 697–698 retest. If buyers step in there and price holds above the 90 EMA, that's the best re-entry zone on the board. Until then, adjusting trailing stops on existing positions and tracking semiconductor leader levels is the appropriate posture.
One honest admission. Over the past few weeks, I leaned too aggressively short and got punished for it. This isn't a market to fade. Changing your mind when the evidence demands it is the baseline of trading.
Next Posts
NVDA vs AVGO vs AMD — Who Is the Real Winner of the Semiconductor Rally?
NVDA vs AVGO vs AMD — Who Is the Real Winner of the Semiconductor Rally?
With SMH ripping above 428, NVDA settled near 200, AVGO cleared 386–387 eyeing 402 and all-time highs, and AMD pushes toward 300 above 267. Combining fundamentals and technicals, AVGO looks most attractive; AMD is suitable only for short-term trades.
The Truth About Low-Volume Bull Markets — 4 Historical Cases That Disprove the Narrative
The Truth About Low-Volume Bull Markets — 4 Historical Cases That Disprove the Narrative
The social-media narrative that "low volume = weakness" breaks down against historical data. The December 2024 post-election rally and all of 2024 climbed on low volume. What matters is combining volume with price levels — volume is decisive only at reversals and breakouts.
SCHD's 2026 Reconstitution — What UNH and Qualcomm In, AbbVie and Cisco Out Actually Mean
SCHD's 2026 Reconstitution — What UNH and Qualcomm In, AbbVie and Cisco Out Actually Mean
SCHD's 2026 reconstitution removed 22 holdings and added 25, dropping AbbVie and Cisco while adding United Health (UNH) and Qualcomm (QCOM). The top sector shifted from energy to consumer staples and healthcare, sharpening SCHD's role as the most effective balancer against tech-heavy portfolios.
Previous Posts
The Math Behind $2,800/Month in Dividends — Principal by Yield, and the 13-to-76-Year Paths
The Math Behind $2,800/Month in Dividends — Principal by Yield, and the 13-to-76-Year Paths
Principal required for $2,800/month in dividends: $1.68M at a 2% yield, $1.12M at 3%, $840K at 4%, $672K at 5%. One variable triples the mountain. $10/day with no seed = 18 years; $15K seed + $30/day = 13 years. The snowball generates 2–5x your contributions.
The Five-Stock Dividend Portfolio — SCHD, CubeSmart, Tractor Supply, Morgan Stanley, AGM
The Five-Stock Dividend Portfolio — SCHD, CubeSmart, Tractor Supply, Morgan Stanley, AGM
Five stocks combining to a 3.71% yield and 17.11% dividend growth rate. SCHD (stable core at 10.43%), CubeSmart (REIT 5.9%), Tractor Supply (19.24%), Morgan Stanley (20.66%), AGM (23.48%). Each plays a distinct role, producing 3x the S&P 500 dividend growth rate.
The Dividend Snowball — Why the S&P 500 Takes 76 Years to Hit $2,800/Month
The Dividend Snowball — Why the S&P 500 Takes 76 Years to Hit $2,800/Month
Same $10-a-day contribution: S&P 500 takes 76 years to reach $2,800/month in dividends; a well-blended dividend portfolio gets there in 18. The gap comes from dividend growth rate (6% vs 17.11%), not yield. Same $1,000 in dividends becomes $3,207 vs $23,100 after 20 years.