Semiconductors Are Driving the NASDAQ Run — 6 Names to Watch Now
Semiconductors Are Driving the NASDAQ Run — 6 Names to Watch Now
TL;DR: SMH is trading roughly 10% above its previous all-time high. NVDA just reclaimed $200 for the first time since November 2024. AVGO and AMD are back at all-time highs. MU, SNDK, and TSM are all aligned with the same move. As long as semis look this strong, NASDAQ is not the short side.
The semiconductor complex is the clearest engine in this market right now. SMH broke through its prior all-time high and has added another 10% on top of it. Given that the breakout itself looked uncertain just a few months ago, the setup is holding firmly.
This piece walks through the six semiconductor names I'm watching most closely this week. Looking inside the sector makes it obvious who's leading — and where the next leg is likely to come from.
1. NVDA — Why Reclaiming $200 Matters
Nvidia cleared $200 again. The last time it traded above this level was November 2024. About five months away — and now it's back.
Two hundred was a confluence of psychological and chart resistance. Reclaiming it signals two things. First, the individual uptrend is functional again. Second, given NVDA's weight in the NASDAQ, the breakout transmits upward pressure to the index itself. Holding alone matters; extension from here pulls the entire sector higher.
2. AVGO — Back Inside All-Time Highs
Broadcom is re-entering all-time-high territory. Demand for AI-accelerator custom ASICs doesn't roll over as long as hyperscaler capex holds. AVGO shares sector leadership with NVDA, and when both names run together, that's when the sector has real force behind it.
3. AMD — New All-Time High
AMD printed a new all-time high. I'll admit I'm not a fan of the name personally, but price action doesn't care about preferences. We're in a regime where even the names you don't favor are making highs. It's a reminder to follow charts over sentiment.
4. MU — A Large Setup Forming
Micron hasn't printed an all-time high yet, but the technical setup is sizable. The structural link between memory names and the HBM demand cycle still holds this year. If it breaks out, the space above resistance is wide open. I'm watching MU as the name that joins the sector rotation late but with room.
5. SNDK — The Quiet Memory Name
SanDisk-related names continue to grind. They rarely make headlines, but they're evidence that memory and storage cycles are pointing the same direction. Looking only at mega-caps misses this story. SNDK fills in a piece that otherwise stays invisible.
6. TSM — Coiled Above $370
TSMC is consolidating around $370. Top-tier global foundry capacity is essentially a TSMC monopoly, and every AI chip effectively routes through this company. A breakout above the 370–380 range opens the next level. I watch TSM as one of the deciding indicators for whether semiconductor strength stays intact.
As Long as Semis Lead, NASDAQ Is Not a Short
Six names laid out in detail, but the single sentence to remember is this: as long as the semiconductor complex leads, NASDAQ is not the short side.
The inverse is the warning signal. If SMH rolls back below its prior high — and specifically if NVDA loses $200 again — that's when the interpretation flips. Until then, trust sector-level strength and hunt for entries at individual stock levels. That's the realistic framework.
Next Posts
Meta Is a Dormant Volcano — My Top Watch This Week
Meta Is a Dormant Volcano — My Top Watch This Week
Meta built a shelf above the 200 DMA and defended the $682 level. The near-term catalyst is a $700 breakout — and the air above it is thin, enabling fast extension. Zuckerberg's AI-infrastructure strategy and sector strength from Nebius, IREN, and CoreWeave support the thesis.
Oil Didn't Revert in 2025 — A Backtest on Why the Contrarian RSI Strategy Failed
Oil Didn't Revert in 2025 — A Backtest on Why the Contrarian RSI Strategy Failed
A 4-period RSI reversal strategy applied to WTI crude across 2025 produced a net loss over 20 trades despite a 60% win rate. Exiting only on overbought/oversold reversals left the strategy defenseless against tail risk — one short drifted to −$346. 2025 was a trending regime: follow, don't fade.
How a 60% Win Rate Still Lost Money — Why Expectancy Beats Win Rate
How a 60% Win Rate Still Lost Money — Why Expectancy Beats Win Rate
A 60% win rate strategy posted a net loss because average win was $50 while average loss was $200. Expectancy = 0.6 × 50 − 0.4 × 200 = −$50. What drives account equity is expectancy, not win rate. An average R/R ratio above 1.5:1 is the survival threshold.
Previous Posts
Is Low Volume on SPY Uptrend a Bull Trap? What the Data Actually Says
Is Low Volume on SPY Uptrend a Bull Trap? What the Data Actually Says
SPY moved 632 to 710 in under three weeks while volume actually dropped into the 40M–60M range. The June-to-October 2024 uptrend ran on the same range. Volume surges happen at reversals and breakouts — not during trend continuation. As long as 695–698 holds, low volume alone is not a trap signal.
Principle-Driven Investing: 5 Rules for Surviving a 127% Overvalued Market
Principle-Driven Investing: 5 Rules for Surviving a 127% Overvalued Market
Five principles for not losing money in a 127% overvalued market: (1) Don't try to call the bottom, (2) Respect your time horizon, (3) Be selective, (4) Follow price, not news, (5) Only buy below intrinsic value. Most investors who tried to time the 2025 bottom missed the recovery. Price is what you pay; value is what you get.
Buffett Indicator at 127% Overvalued — S&P 7,022 and the Most Expensive Market in History
Buffett Indicator at 127% Overvalued — S&P 7,022 and the Most Expensive Market in History
The market cap / GDP ratio (Buffett Indicator) sits at 127% overvalued. The 10-year CAPE is 40.24 — 2.3x the historical average of 17.84. The 2000 dot-com peak (45-47%, CAPE 44.19) was lower than today, and Buffett closed his partnership in 1968 at just 24%. Costco and Walmart trade at 50-60x FCF, while some software names have pulled back into margin-of-safety territory.