Five Rules for Treating AI Infrastructure Stocks as Tactical, Not Core
Five Rules for Treating AI Infrastructure Stocks as Tactical, Not Core
Five Rules for Treating AI Infrastructure Stocks as Tactical, Not Core
Debt-to-equity across the five AI infrastructure names runs from 31% (Coherent) to 387% (CoreWeave). Treat them all with the same position size, and the weakest link ends up holding the most weight in your book. Here are the five rules I run them through.
1. Separate core holds from tactical bets explicitly
Nvidia and TSMC are core. Coherent, CoreWeave, Nebius, Iren, and Applied Digital are tactical. Mixing them in your sizing means your highest-risk names get core-sized exposure. I keep the combined weight of these five inside a low-to-mid double-digit percentage of the portfolio, no more.
2. Make D/E the first filter
One-line rule: if D/E crosses 100%, tighten the macro scenario by one notch.
| Company | D/E |
|---|---|
| Coherent | 31.1% |
| Nebius | 108.3% |
| Applied Digital | 110.1% |
| Iren | 148.8% |
| CoreWeave | 387.6% |
CoreWeave's 387.6% alone is enough to disqualify it as a core hold.
3. If operating cash flow is negative, price in dilution upfront
All five have negative OCF. They can't pay their own bills from operations. That leaves two paths — issue more debt or issue more shares. Both are bad for existing shareholders. My base case is mid-to-high single-digit annual dilution for this group.
4. Pre-set position sizes by macro scenario
Build three macro paths — rates higher, sideways, lower — and pre-commit a size for each name in each path. Deciding after an event is too late. CoreWeave-style leverage only gets full size in a rate-cut path.
5. Separate "story" from "business"
CoreWeave with negative gross margin isn't a business yet — it's a story. Stories are fine to bet on, but only at "story size." Businesses (think Coherent — profitable, low leverage) can carry "business size." Treating them the same is how your largest exposure ends up on the most fragile name.
FAQ
Q: Should I just own Coherent? A: It's the safest, but its 21.4% growth is the lowest in the group. If you want growth exposure, pairing in a small Nebius position is reasonable. The "single safe name" isn't always optimal.
Q: Is Iren's 148.8% debt too risky? A: On its own, yes — but it pairs with Nvidia's $2.1B right to invest and a PEG of 1.44, the cheapest in the group. "Cheap risk" and "expensive risk" are different trades.
Q: Can Nebius keep growing at 506%? A: Most of that is the base effect — growth off a small revenue base. It will likely normalize to double digits over the next 12-24 months. That normalization itself is the biggest risk to the stock.
Q: Should I buy all five at once? A: All five share the same macro exposure (rates, hyperscaler capex), so diversification within the group is weaker than it looks. Building in tranches against scenario triggers beats a single full-size entry.
More in this Category
Why the Dollar Is Strengthening Again: My Full Forex Book
Why the Dollar Is Strengthening Again: My Full Forex Book
The dollar index is defending 99.75 and eyeing 100.5, then 102. I break down my actual positions — a UUP long sitting around $4,000 in gains, short pound, short euro, and a yen long setup — alongside their fundamental scores.
What Snapchat Taught Me About the SpaceX IPO
What Snapchat Taught Me About the SpaceX IPO
Across the last 15 years, 30 major IPOs posted an average one-year drawdown of roughly 55%. CoreWeave, up 300% in three months, is on that same list. Ahead of the SpaceX IPO, here's what tends to wait behind a glamorous debut — told through Snapchat.
The Largest IPO Ever: SpaceX Goes Public — and the Question of Fast-Tracking Unprofitable Giants Into the Nasdaq
The Largest IPO Ever: SpaceX Goes Public — and the Question of Fast-Tracking Unprofitable Giants Into the Nasdaq
SpaceX went public in the largest IPO in history, swinging more than 10% in its first five minutes of trading, with Nasdaq index inclusion fast-tracked within 15 days. Here's what rushing unprofitable mega-caps into the index really means.
Next Posts
SpaceX IPO at $1.75 Trillion: What Every Investor Needs to Know Before June 12
SpaceX IPO at $1.75 Trillion: What Every Investor Needs to Know Before June 12
SpaceX is set to become the largest IPO in stock market history at a $1.75 trillion valuation. With Starlink's $4.42 billion operating income doubling year-over-year, here's what the 120x revenue multiple really means.
OpenAI vs Anthropic: Inside the Trillion-Dollar AI IPO Race
OpenAI vs Anthropic: Inside the Trillion-Dollar AI IPO Race
OpenAI at $840 billion and Anthropic surging from $380 billion toward $1 trillion in months — two AI companies, two radically different strategies, and neither is profitable yet.
5 Principles to Separate Price from Value in the 2026 IPO Boom
5 Principles to Separate Price from Value in the 2026 IPO Boom
From SpaceX's $1.75 trillion valuation to Inspire Brands' $20 billion franchise empire, 2026's mega-IPOs demand discipline. Here are the principles that separate investors from speculators.
Previous Posts
Palantir Isn't a SaaS Company — It's Infrastructure
Palantir Isn't a SaaS Company — It's Infrastructure
Classify Palantir as SaaS and the valuation looks insane next to a 19% YTD drop. But +85% revenue, a 145% Rule of 40, and 150% net retention say this isn't software — it's industrial-grade infrastructure.
Palantir Just Printed Record Numbers — Why Did the Market Yawn?
Palantir Just Printed Record Numbers — Why Did the Market Yawn?
Palantir posted $1.63B in quarterly revenue (+85% YoY), 60% operating margin, 53% net margin, US business +104%, and a 145% Rule of 40 — all in one quarter. The stock is still down ~19% on the year.
Palantir Is Down 19% This Year — Should You Have Sold?
Palantir Is Down 19% This Year — Should You Have Sold?
Palantir is down ~19% YTD even as it printed its best quarter ever. Here's how I think through whether to hold, sell, or add — and why the real problem is usually anchor, not analysis.